(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Obviously couldn't see the penalty "goal" at the game but unfortunately have to say Dublin were the better team, ghost goal aside they deserved the win. tearintom (Wexford) - Posts: 1480 - 26/04/2025 20:28:32 2604472 Link 0 |
Have to agree without Burke and sucliffe we should have been good enough to win.The usual problems arose again missed frees no phsicality in the the middle third cant compete in the air and some of what we consider our best players are too in and out in games.All is not lost but how can we expect to improve if we keep doing the same things over and over again.Need a better game plan and cant be given up the puckouts to opposition we need to be quicker on the line as well we either have a panel or not.
Tiger1 (Wexford) - Posts: 327 - 26/04/2025 20:45:11 2604478 Link 0 |
Been saying it for years lads we are to small of a intercounty team not 1 of our backs other than Liam Ryan are over 6 foot.. our forwards other than Jack o Mac and chin are all under 6 foot… every puck out reigned down on chin today in 2nd half no other option.. on the game it's self couldn't see the peno decision as I was at the other terrice at far side.. what I did see was one of our backs catching the ball cleanly why couldn't he just clear it think it might of. Been mcguckian… other goals couldn't see who was at fault… think Liam Ryan should of been on at half time.. Dunbar terrible in first half and at least 3 of Dublin scores came from his fumbling and poor decisions.. management in my opinion should be questioned in why we didn't push up on puck outs.. there backs delivery into forwards killed us all day… chin immense again what we going to do when his not there..onto Galway now can see Jacki Mac and jippo all starting as we wil have to match them physically gannett83 (Wexford) - Posts: 311 - 26/04/2025 21:15:44 2604486 Link 0 |
Too slow to make changes when it was painfully obvious we were struggling in defence and in the physical stakes. beano (Wexford) - Posts: 1482 - 26/04/2025 21:17:47 2604488 Link 0 |
I dunno, I think there are some unfair comments being made about Dublin here, they were teriffic and could hardly have hurled any better, saying they didn't have to bring anything out of the ordinary doesn't align with hitting 3-26 and only 4 wides ElGranSenor (Wexford) - Posts: 451 - 26/04/2025 21:38:15 2604495 Link 1 |
They knocked in a load of high ball, won most of it, and got scores out of it. That used to be the game of hurling and full credit to Dublin for recognising a weakness and exploiting it. But that's all they did! We have brilliant hurlers in this team, wonderful stickmen, but if we can't win our own ball and if we can't defend a high ball in the absence of Liam Ryan then what is the point! It's just an elaborate torture.
NR55 (Wexford) - Posts: 4 - 26/04/2025 22:28:05 2604504 Link 1 |
That's all they had to do
WEXILE (Wexford) - Posts: 353 - 26/04/2025 22:42:46 2604505 Link 0 |
I can't believe the two umpires told fanning the ball had not crossed the line,then was overruled by the ref. That was a massive momentum swing, I still feel we would of won that game today, the heads went down after penalty, , A massive save by Fanning which will be marked down as a goal for Dublin and no credit to Fanning, All games should have technology, we would of won that game today otherwise! Momentum swings are massive in hurling fathermurphy (Wexford) - Posts: 323 - 26/04/2025 22:46:33 2604506 Link 0 |
God that post is even more depressing than the performance. Dublin got the win they deserved because they worked harder and wanted it more. That's not to say we can't win our next 4 games and win Leinster.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 26/04/2025 23:58:57 2604513 Link 0 |
The only reason to concede short puckouts is so your forwards and midfielders can work like dogs to win it back. Or force poor balls forwards played under pressure. Collectively ours didn't. Dublins did.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:00:55 2604514 Link 0 |
Yep. we had nearly 3 times as many wides.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:01:49 2604515 Link 0 |
In fairness to Conor he's a midfielder plugging holes at the back.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:03:05 2604516 Link 0 |
Ryan looked very rusty to be fair when he came on. Got beaten in one high ball himself too. Must be a real concern about his fitness but 10-15mins at end of Antrim game surely would have been of benefit. The obvious change for me was an early swap of Donohue and Foley. Commentator mentioned it too. Donohue hit two horrible sides in first half and Foley was under pressure. Rossi had a strange day on the line. He improved for sure but Dunbar was very fortunate not to be hooked after about 20mins. Bringing Ryan on after three goals going in was too late and CBD for Byrne in the 73rd minute! In any case, I don't think there was much in the game really. Both full back lines were incredibly weak so lots of goals and goal chances from direct ball. When you only have one forward capable of winning his own ball at this level you are going nowhere. ROC is a fine player ball in hand but that's not enough. Defensively we were a mess. Damien Reck awful again at 6. McGuckian despite doing well for our first goal simply nowhere near decisive enough in possession for this level. Dropping the ball after a great catch sums him up. Our weakness in the air at the back every team targets but we went back to very bad habits of not defending as a unit. One of the Dublin goals had a man left by himself inside for ages, our lads ball watching or their own man. With no 3 or 6 we are at nothing. In saying all that I thought we were a little unfortunate on the day and not all is lost, referee played with the home team. Kevin Foley was our best I thought then Chin, Rory, Hearne and Cian Molloy had their moments. At least we are giving younger players a chance now but Foley and Lawlor were replaced, Lawlor struggling to step up to this level at midfield. For the next day, maybe Damien Reck to midfield? Ryan x 2, S Reck, Foley, Molloy, maybe try Lawlor at 7 where he played in the league. Hearne, D Reck. KFoley, Chin, Rory, Byrne, Casey, CBD. Think Dunbar would be a better sub to come in. Timbertony (Wexford) - Posts: 380 - 27/04/2025 00:06:04 2604518 Link 0 |
Spot on. Our forwards put little to no pressure on their backs coming out with the ball.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:06:52 2604519 Link 0 |
That's unkind to Dublin to be honest. They outworked us, played at a higher tempo, won nearly every ruck in the 2nd half, broke faster than we did, wasted less ball, got turned over less often, made faster and better decisions, and just plain wanted it more. Alots been said about Hethertons size in posts here, but his hurling was excellent also.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:11:02 2604522 Link 0 |
Niall Murphy is a good fullback. Played there most of his life.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:12:18 2604523 Link 0 |
They ran through us at will also.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 15482 - 27/04/2025 00:12:48 2604524 Link 0 |
However he wasn't alone in turning over possession. Everyone will look what happened at the back but we weathered that and at the end of the day it was the turnovers all over the field that killed us. If you look back you will also see we didn't come out the right side of the rucks either and that sometimes is down to physicality. Turnovers come from a hungry team and at times I just did not see that hunger in some of the play from Wexford but it was there from Dublin but also there off the ball and link play was far better especially when coming out of the defense. Hurling is now a possession game and if you give the ball away cheaply you will be punished.
zinny (Wexford) - Posts: 1945 - 27/04/2025 04:47:32 2604528 Link 0 |
Why? is it because I am not delusional as to our and other teams abilities?
zinny (Wexford) - Posts: 1945 - 27/04/2025 05:02:25 2604530 Link 0 |
It really was frustrating to look at. Magpie2 (Wexford) - Posts: 430 - 27/04/2025 06:41:03 2604535 Link 0 |