National Forum

Boards Forum Restructuring

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post


Replying To Marlon_JD:  "Ormond, you're making a rod for your own back. The threads where you responded to yourself as another user (Baltra) are easily found. You actually owned up to it in the one thread, and that thread is still active. Do you really want people to post a link to it? It might be better to just leave it alone."
And then there was silence!

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 10:46:27    2291389

Link

Replying To TheFlaker:  "And then there was silence!"
Admin will you acknowledge the things that have been repeated 100 times and maybe close the thread down?

Love,
Everybody( Bar1)

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6765 - 08/09/2020 14:17:43


Maybe if people like yourself stopped commenting on here, it would die a natural death. It had been two days since anyone made a comment, then you brought the topic back to the top of the list.

Cockney_Cat (UK) - Posts: 1134 - 10/09/2020 11:01:55    2291393

Link

Replying To Cockney_Cat:  "Admin will you acknowledge the things that have been repeated 100 times and maybe close the thread down?

Love,
Everybody( Bar1)

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6765 - 08/09/2020 14:17:43


Maybe if people like yourself stopped commenting on here, it would die a natural death. It had been two days since anyone made a comment, then you brought the topic back to the top of the list."
You ok hun?

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 11:13:03    2291397

Link

Replying To Canuck:  "I have said it before the majority of posters on here are on for good debate and sometimes a bit of fun banter, back and forth. Like all aspect of life there are always the few who like to make themselves look good by making others look bad. You can smell them a mile away. Any format or technical up grades is not going to change that. In fact the old chat out side the chapel gate works if no-one is trying to establish a hierarchy. Usually they get avoided like the plague if so."
Format and Technical upgrades should encourage more people to actually join the forum. You only have to look at other sites and users there saying the site here is so outdated.
Format changes and following procedures like on other websites will make the site better

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 13:27:38    2291412

Link

Replying To Marlon_JD:  "Ormond, you're making a rod for your own back. The threads where you responded to yourself as another user (Baltra) are easily found. You actually owned up to it in the one thread, and that thread is still active. Do you really want people to post a link to it? It might be better to just leave it alone."
Go on then. Post the link. I dont really care. Not like it hasnt happened on multiple times with many other people on this site before.
This site needs to be revamped. It would encourage more people to join.
List all who are moderators on the main page of the forum should be a priority.
Should everyone not know who manages the forum?

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 13:29:40    2291413

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "Go on then. Post the link. I dont really care. Not like it hasnt happened on multiple times with many other people on this site before.
This site needs to be revamped. It would encourage more people to join.
List all who are moderators on the main page of the forum should be a priority.
Should everyone not know who manages the forum?"
So you deny it and ask someone to prove it. Then when you know it can be proved you say you don't care as other people have done it. Some boyo.

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 13:53:10    2291415

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "Format and Technical upgrades should encourage more people to actually join the forum. You only have to look at other sites and users there saying the site here is so outdated.
Format changes and following procedures like on other websites will make the site better"
Who says more people using it is better or would make it better? Maybe its uniqueness is its size. Let others join if they want and if not enjoy the team we have. Better just might be in the eye of the beholder. "Up the forum."

Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 1078 - 10/09/2020 14:42:44    2291426

Link

Replying To TheFlaker:  "So you deny it and ask someone to prove it. Then when you know it can be proved you say you don't care as other people have done it. Some boyo."
This site is known for multiple people using multiple accounts. To just have a go at me is typical of you.

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 14:56:35    2291429

Link

Replying To Canuck:  "Who says more people using it is better or would make it better? Maybe its uniqueness is its size. Let others join if they want and if not enjoy the team we have. Better just might be in the eye of the beholder. "Up the forum.""
That is ridiculous. The forum is tiny. It could be so much better. Why do people not want a better site?

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 14:57:19    2291430

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "This site is known for multiple people using multiple accounts. To just have a go at me is typical of you."
Because you denied it and asked the poster to prove it. Absolutely pathetic that people would have multiple accounts. Embarrassing.

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 15:04:42    2291431

Link

Replying To TheFlaker:  "Because you denied it and asked the poster to prove it. Absolutely pathetic that people would have multiple accounts. Embarrassing."
Yes i had a second account. Far from the only one to ever do it on this forum

Still doesnt take away from how this site needs to be changed and brought closer to nearly every other forum.

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 15:18:04    2291433

Link

Just for the record, while there's always ways to improve anything, I find the forum to be perfectly serviceable for my needs.

The Forum used to be much busier but in my opinion there are a couple of prominent posters here who like to mod threads themselves and frankly that has stifled debate to the point that it's often just not worth contributing. It's nothing to do with the site format

Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 11733 - 10/09/2020 15:30:45    2291434

Link

If it's perfectly fine to have several logins, then why did you deny having them multiple times on this thread alone?

Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 11733 - 10/09/2020 15:46:47    2291435

Link

Replying To Breffni39:  "Just for the record, while there's always ways to improve anything, I find the forum to be perfectly serviceable for my needs.

The Forum used to be much busier but in my opinion there are a couple of prominent posters here who like to mod threads themselves and frankly that has stifled debate to the point that it's often just not worth contributing. It's nothing to do with the site format"
Says you. You do it to me all the time. The double standards and hypocrisy from some very prominent members of the forum is unreal.
The forum is smaller in terms of regular users but to try imply thats due to me is ridiculous. Its due to a lot more than me. Well so many abuse me which would put off many from contributing as i offer a different view to the majority so why would you join if you think your opinion will be abused if it differs from the clique on this site

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 15:55:02    2291437

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "Yes i had a second account. Far from the only one to ever do it on this forum

Still doesnt take away from how this site needs to be changed and brought closer to nearly every other forum."
To me it's just another example of people who have way, way too much time on their hands on care that much about their ego on an anonymous forum that they set up other accounts to back up their point of view. Pathetic stuff. You wanting to make changes here while committing the worst offence of the lot is nothing short of hilarious.

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 16:02:32    2291438

Link

Replying To TheFlaker:  "To me it's just another example of people who have way, way too much time on their hands on care that much about their ego on an anonymous forum that they set up other accounts to back up their point of view. Pathetic stuff. You wanting to make changes here while committing the worst offence of the lot is nothing short of hilarious."
Im not committing worst offence at all. There has been plenty of other users using multiple accounts on this website for years.
Its discussed on other forums as a major criticism of this site for years


The way you treat me says you care about your ego as much as i do you hypocrite.

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 16:11:29    2291441

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "Im not committing worst offence at all. There has been plenty of other users using multiple accounts on this website for years.
Its discussed on other forums as a major criticism of this site for years


The way you treat me says you care about your ego as much as i do you hypocrite."
Anyone who has 2 accounts and backs up their own views needs to get a new hobby.

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 6943 - 10/09/2020 16:17:17    2291442

Link

Replying To KillingFields:  "
Replying To Breffni39:  "Just for the record, while there's always ways to improve anything, I find the forum to be perfectly serviceable for my needs.

The Forum used to be much busier but in my opinion there are a couple of prominent posters here who like to mod threads themselves and frankly that has stifled debate to the point that it's often just not worth contributing. It's nothing to do with the site format"
Says you. You do it to me all the time. The double standards and hypocrisy from some very prominent members of the forum is unreal.
The forum is smaller in terms of regular users but to try imply thats due to me is ridiculous. Its due to a lot more than me. Well so many abuse me which would put off many from contributing as i offer a different view to the majority so why would you join if you think your opinion will be abused if it differs from the clique on this site"
If you think myself and yourself are comparable in how we post then there's absolutely no reasoning with you.

It's pretty apparent that the rugby discussion has died a death since you decided you were in charge of all the threads

Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 11733 - 10/09/2020 18:47:50    2291461

Link

Replying To Breffni39:  "
Replying To KillingFields:  "[quote=Breffni39:  "Just for the record, while there's always ways to improve anything, I find the forum to be perfectly serviceable for my needs.

The Forum used to be much busier but in my opinion there are a couple of prominent posters here who like to mod threads themselves and frankly that has stifled debate to the point that it's often just not worth contributing. It's nothing to do with the site format"
Says you. You do it to me all the time. The double standards and hypocrisy from some very prominent members of the forum is unreal.
The forum is smaller in terms of regular users but to try imply thats due to me is ridiculous. Its due to a lot more than me. Well so many abuse me which would put off many from contributing as i offer a different view to the majority so why would you join if you think your opinion will be abused if it differs from the clique on this site"
If you think myself and yourself are comparable in how we post then there's absolutely no reasoning with you.

It's pretty apparent that the rugby discussion has died a death since you decided you were in charge of all the threads"]They way you treat me and others with condescending and dismissive posts makes you as bad as me.

KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1864 - 10/09/2020 20:35:06    2291469

Link

Replying To Breffni39:  "
Replying To KillingFields:  "[quote=Breffni39:  "Just for the record, while there's always ways to improve anything, I find the forum to be perfectly serviceable for my needs.

The Forum used to be much busier but in my opinion there are a couple of prominent posters here who like to mod threads themselves and frankly that has stifled debate to the point that it's often just not worth contributing. It's nothing to do with the site format"
Says you. You do it to me all the time. The double standards and hypocrisy from some very prominent members of the forum is unreal.
The forum is smaller in terms of regular users but to try imply thats due to me is ridiculous. Its due to a lot more than me. Well so many abuse me which would put off many from contributing as i offer a different view to the majority so why would you join if you think your opinion will be abused if it differs from the clique on this site"
If you think myself and yourself are comparable in how we post then there's absolutely no reasoning with you.

It's pretty apparent that the rugby discussion has died a death since you decided you were in charge of all the threads"]What is this "rugby discussion"?

Cockney_Cat (UK) - Posts: 1134 - 10/09/2020 22:12:19    2291480

Link