(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
|
...the lads a nordie, they cant help themselves but bring up 'the troubles' stuff!!! Snufalufagus (Dublin) - Posts: 8100 - 14/03/2013 17:39:04 1349603 Link 0 |
|
Serious question here - how many of you actually read the posts on here? Tyronetim (Tyrone) - Posts: 1254 - 14/03/2013 18:40:27 1349631 Link 0 |
|
I actually like Paul Galvin and always have done. He is a smashing footballer and I like his non-conformist eccentric ways AND I believe him when he says he wasn't at the sectarian wind up lark. He should not have been spat at, NO ONE should be spat at on a football pitch, and as I say if someone from Cookstown is found guilty he should get a ban; that is my opinion. Having said that if the GAA are going to investigate this they should maybe widen it to ask why would a certain player react in that manner OR they should set up a separate inquiry into on and off field abuse particularly the deeply offensive, partitionist stuff often directed at Ulster players. I NEVER said at any time that Ulster GAA people hold our members from others provinces responsible for what we lived through; I DID say that they often have NO understanding whatsoever of the annoyance and hurt that this abuse causes to Ulster GAA people especially when some of our members lie in their graves because of their association with the GAA. I would honestly say that if that was directed at me on a pitch I would probably react in a manner that would get me a long ban. I and many other Ulster memories have too many memories and experiences to let some wee so and so from Ballymuck 100 miles away who never lived through it to disrespect them. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9840 - 14/03/2013 19:24:59 1349653 Link 0 |
|
A bit ironic how all the ulster lads are complaining about verbal abuse on the football field when they themselves are the masters of it redandgreen (None) - Posts: 691 - 14/03/2013 19:31:53 1349659 Link 0 |
|
Shouldn't spit. End of. Next discussion. tyroneed (Tyrone) - Posts: 753 - 14/03/2013 19:44:58 1349674 Link 0 |
|
Shouldn't spit. End of. Next discussion. Liameen (USA) - Posts: 38 - 14/03/2013 20:36:30 1349701 Link 0 |
|
Ridiculous act, disgusting.........clear evidence available, open and shut case for a lengthy ban for that fella. No place for it in on a football field. Edged_in_Maroon (Galway) - Posts: 266 - 15/03/2013 09:20:52 1349785 Link 0 |
|
Open and shut case , No Spitting , and to bring history ,culture , or perceived lack of understanding in as a defence insults all intelligent people . Damothedub (Dublin) - Posts: 5193 - 15/03/2013 09:38:34 1349793 Link 0 |
|
I think the fact that Paul Galvin coming forward and speaking out against this nasty business is a very positive outcome Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 508 - 15/03/2013 09:44:41 1349797 Link 0 |
|
Absolutely Beelzedub, there should be none of this 'heat of the moment' excuse for an incident like this. There should be a hearing and this guy should be told straight out, explain why you spat on your opponent. If he tells the truth i.e. I spat on him because of who he was and I wanted to get a reaction, then give him a fair ban. If he frustrates the issue even more with some nonsense excuse, then ban him accordingly. People should have to answer for their actions. I accept that a bit of handbags will happen in games, but ths type of thing is just a disgrace, and it reflects badly on our game if we dont address it. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 15/03/2013 10:28:51 1349831 Link 0 |
|
Meanwhile the thread on the much more recent spitting incident, which coincidentally doesn't involve a nordie, has long dropped of the first page... Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 12494 - 15/03/2013 10:40:46 1349844 Link 0 |
|
Breffni39 Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 508 - 15/03/2013 11:17:59 1349866 Link 0 |
|
Tyronetim FairShoulder (Armagh) - Posts: 333 - 15/03/2013 11:51:04 1349889 Link 0 |
|
This is the clip of the finuge clubman spitting on the cookstown clubman, or at least that is what is is supposed to be. All I can see is the cookstown guy spitting at the finuge guy and the finuge guy spitting back at him... Am I missing something here? TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 15/03/2013 11:55:03 1349894 Link 0 |
|
Jimbo has simply resorted to agitating now, he's using the same posts word for word on the other related thread (why we have 2 threads on the same theme is anybodies guess), his motives are obvious and not as 'noble' as he would like to make himself out to be, I have no time for him nor his thread, at least ath cliath has already called him out on this and for that he has my praise and thanks. brendtheredhand (Tyrone) - Posts: 10897 - 15/03/2013 12:18:37 1349913 Link 0 |
|
brendtheredhand Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 508 - 15/03/2013 12:32:07 1349925 Link 0 |
|
The master, as I saw it the official spat first (at 7 seconds), then the Cookstown player spat back, then the official spat again. It's bad video quality and I could be wrong. MichaelO (Tyrone) - Posts: 820 - 15/03/2013 12:34:08 1349926 Link 0 |
|
Thing is we (the viewing public) cant hear verbal exchanges between 2 players on the pitch but we can see one player spitting on another so its only natural the revulsion is associated with the spitting. Ask yourself does a fellow Irishman deserve to be spat on if he makes sectarian / racist / personal remarks during a game? If so were does that leave the GAA has a pillar of Irish society? Offside_Rule (Antrim) - Posts: 4058 - 15/03/2013 12:40:40 1349934 Link 0 |
|
Brend you're getting very personal with your responses to me which I think is out of order. Beelzedub (Dublin) - Posts: 508 - 15/03/2013 12:41:46 1349935 Link 0 |
|
MichaelO, I have to say Im not convinced he did spit there. He might have, as you say it is poor quality. But judging from the reactions, I mean the cookstown guy doesnt revulse at all at 7 seconds, in fact his spitting incident is so fast afterwards that I dont think it could be a response to the first one. Secondly, the finuge guy looks to have come forward and is in the process of saying something when the spit comes his way. Also, when the finuge guy is spit on, look at the way he recoils in disgust, while the cookstown guy starts backpeddling, this is what you would expect from the first instance if it were a spitting incident. Finally, we see the finuge guy spit at the cookstown guy with real temper, surely that temper wouldnt be so prevailent if he had been the one that spat in the first place? I know I am second guessing here, but we all know how people react to such things, and it doesnt really add up. TheMaster (Mayo) - Posts: 16187 - 15/03/2013 12:55:33 1349947 Link 0 |