(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
S Goldrick.. Not just yourself but a lot others, i think yous are having a serious knee-jerk reaction to 1 teams tactics/style of play.. No need to change rules at all unless very mildly in some cases. i.e square ball situation created a few sticky situations over the last 2 years.. People on about Donegal destroying football, if we start to tinker with the rule book to the extent people are on about, we will destroy football. The sport evolves naturally in my opinion and its up to other teams to impose their style of play, show teams the best style for getting results... p.s some of the rule changes proposed are laughable, make game 90 mins, how innovative, how did anyone think of that.. OH, and the reasoning behind it, to tire the payers and make them think about conserving their energy... I can see the attendances at these games going through the roof with these games... as i say, knee-jerk and uncalled for..... change record please... 81DLSAM (Donegal) - Posts: 281 - 02/09/2011 09:13:52 1025260 Link 0 |
As I said in my post this was not a reaction to Donegal but an because of the way all players are now fitter than before. s goldrick (Cavan) - Posts: 5520 - 02/09/2011 10:20:11 1025305 Link 0 |
The full forward line should not be allowed over the half way line to defend. Donegalman (None) - Posts: 3846 - 02/09/2011 10:34:07 1025316 Link 0 |
I'd agree that there is no need to change yet. 13 a side has been advocated by Mick O'Dwyer for over a decade now but there is just no need yet. Negative teams will always be around but surely any manager looking at Donegal's Ultra- negative performance the last day will say that your chances of winning if you only have 1 attack in the last 30 minutes are dramatically reduced. For that reason we will see the end of this Donegal team's recent performances soon enough and a toned down version next year. Please God I am right because it was vomit. thykingdomcome (Kerry) - Posts: 1206 - 02/09/2011 10:39:40 1025318 Link 0 |
Listen i am no hugh fan of Mcg tactics but to say they did not work is just downright wrong. Donegal won ulster and got to a all ireland semi and were a kick from final. Now considering donegal did not win a championship game in 3 years i think not only did it work but it has worked very well. Also the over the top critism of McG is uncalled for. Its his first year. Usually your first job is to install belief to players and he has done this. So yes hopefully he expands donegals game, as he has siad he will. And this is a reaction to the semi so dont fool yourself. One last point. The nature of the comments on RTE has to stop. These are amature players who give their time for nothing. THE EXTRAMAN (Donegal) - Posts: 554 - 02/09/2011 12:57:03 1025436 Link 0 |
The Donegal bus was seen leaving Dublin with 14 players in the back and one up front!! ballybannongael (Down) - Posts: 547 - 02/09/2011 12:57:52 1025439 Link 0 |
Extraman, thykingdomcome (Kerry) - Posts: 1206 - 02/09/2011 13:54:39 1025485 Link 0 |
how about let managers chose whatever tactics they want!! If Dublin were good enough they would have beaten the Donegal tactics much more easily cboyle92 (Down) - Posts: 184 - 02/09/2011 14:10:29 1025505 Link 0 |
Ok kingdomcome your suggesting that only one county in ireland will have the right tactics all year. Every other performance and game is secondary. Please dont be so naive and childlike. Donegal were more defensive in the semi because this was the best team they met all year by a distance and it so nearly worked. Im not saying i 100% agree with the tactics but please think outside the box. If your telling me that first round defeat 3 years in a row and then winning ulster and coming close to a all ireland final is not a successfull year then you must be relates to that other man stuck in the past from kerry, or you work for RTE. If so im sorry for your troubles THE EXTRAMAN (Donegal) - Posts: 554 - 02/09/2011 14:40:59 1025545 Link 0 |
Also dublin were a man down for last 12 mins. THE EXTRAMAN (Donegal) - Posts: 554 - 02/09/2011 14:42:07 1025550 Link 0 |
13 a side!!!!........Oh no, now Dungall will only be able to get 12 people behind the ball!!! Snufalufagus (Dublin) - Posts: 8100 - 02/09/2011 14:48:42 1025556 Link 0 |
The Sunday Game Live attracts 934,000 viewers THE EXTRAMAN (Donegal) - Posts: 554 - 02/09/2011 14:59:26 1025565 Link 0 |
He can chose whatever tactics he wants as can any manager. But I and the other 900,000 shocked viewers on RTE have the right to say that we will chose the next time that don't want to see it again. And we will turn over. thykingdomcome (Kerry) - Posts: 1206 - 02/09/2011 16:15:47 1025644 Link 0 |
THE EXTRAMAN thistle_harps (UK) - Posts: 879 - 02/09/2011 17:01:03 1025697 Link 0 |
thykingdomcome tomaoo7 (Dublin) - Posts: 5896 - 02/09/2011 17:41:29 1025730 Link 0 |
That well may be kingdom but you are still not looking at the entiew season which was a success. No one can deny this. Anyway the thing that is annoying me is not the argument over tactics its the over the top reaction by the rte panelists. Remember these guys get paid very well for turning up and giving fair views on the game. At the minute its a compitation between spillane and brolly who can come out with the most shocking pharse. And dont get me started on tony the rabbite davies THE EXTRAMAN (Donegal) - Posts: 554 - 02/09/2011 17:44:05 1025731 Link 0 |
As it stands there are teams playing all sorts of tactics. Thats fair enough. I have nothing against Kildare or Donegal or Dublin putting 10 or 12 players behind the ball as they do. Thats their business, its all fair. Noone is breaking any rules (except referees I might add who don't do their jobs). So its fair game, whatever tactics you want. My point is just that there are too many players at such a high fitness level that more and more games are suffering in quality because of congestion all over the field. Players can get to where the ball is in no time, meaning that there are 10 players onto a break no matter where on the field it is. Reducing the number of players to 13 would still ensure that there is good competitive football. But it would limit the ability of teams to crowd midfield or crowd their defence, reduce the gang tackle and the scrum over every breaking ball. It would not eliminate it, but it would really improve things. icehonesty (Wexford) - Posts: 2573 - 02/09/2011 21:50:12 1025886 Link 0 |