(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Brian farrells red card was a joke. If your man stays on his feet then there's no red care. How he hasn't come out in the press to back connolly il never know. clondalkindub (Dublin) - Posts: 9926 - 02/09/2011 15:24:26 1025591 Link 0 |
Coylers Elbow Laughing.Gravy (Dublin) - Posts: 404 - 02/09/2011 16:02:16 1025633 Link 0 |
s goldrick Joxer (Dublin) - Posts: 4745 - 02/09/2011 18:05:30 1025749 Link 0 |
why do most dublin people here think that every1 is jealous of them?jealous of what exactly?sick of reading about the whole country being against yous and 'if it had of been a dublin player...'!liams threads and comments are the most annoyin! achara (Monaghan) - Posts: 584 - 02/09/2011 18:46:44 1025761 Link 0 |
LAds, Connolly WILL get off! It will have nothing to do with the punch or lack of punch etc, but the fact the ref never took his name! I'm telling yiz! glenquagmire (Dublin) - Posts: 20 - 02/09/2011 19:07:36 1025776 Link 0 |
Well well well glenquagmire looks like you were right after all Floops (Dublin) - Posts: 1623 - 05/09/2011 12:17:12 1027229 Link 0 |
I would expect that the rule as written is intended to apply to the GAA as a whole in that it is unlikely that a referee will know the name of every player he referees. At senior inter county level and more exactly and All Ireland semi final I would find it incredible that the referee does not know every player. The rule is written so as to be able to identify the player and that shouldn't really be an issue in this case. I have no doubt however that Croke Park will acquiesce to the Dublin County Board for one reason or another omaghredhand (Tyrone) - Posts: 3656 - 05/09/2011 12:35:29 1027256 Link 0 |
omaghredhand Floops (Dublin) - Posts: 1623 - 05/09/2011 12:46:34 1027268 Link 0 |
I wouldn't say that exactly Floops, its a technicality of the highest order. I would expect Dublin CB to back their man to the hilt, but just because he gets off does not mean that justice prevails. In my view the referee was right to send him off according to the rules. On a personal level however I would feel sorry for the lad if he missed out omaghredhand (Tyrone) - Posts: 3656 - 05/09/2011 13:42:16 1027326 Link 0 |
Connolly and the Dubs may feel aggrieved but he lifted his hand three times in a striking action and that is a sending off offence. What the Donegal player did or didn't do is totally irrelevant to the outcome. What is particularly nauseating is the campaign started by certain Dublin sports journalists, and one newspaper group in particular, to influence any appeal outcome. They are disgustingly using terms like 'Miscarriage of Justice', "Free the Dublin One', 'Justice should prevail' etc etc. If this was a Tyrone or Armagh player or even Kerry's Paul Galvin there wouldn't be a dickybird said in their defence. The Dublin sports media are truly a horrible shower. Ulsterman (Antrim) - Posts: 9818 - 05/09/2011 13:59:33 1027350 Link 0 |
glenquagmire (Dublin) - Posts: 20 - 05/09/2011 14:48:19 1027418 Link 0 |
Yeah omaghredhand I know where you're coming from - just a little tongue-in-cheek from me there. Floops (Dublin) - Posts: 1623 - 05/09/2011 14:58:40 1027440 Link 0 |
The Dublin GAA sports media is made up almost entirely of "country folk." CapitalGains (Dublin) - Posts: 40 - 05/09/2011 16:05:14 1027506 Link 0 |
Delighted for Diarmuid Connolly now he has been cleared to play, personally for him what a relief it must be. But this is all becoming tiresome, we either have rules and regulations or we don't. I don't believe he deserved a red, a yellow max, but along with the Donegal player for feigning an injury and the other Donegal player for doing exactly what Connolly did - that would have been the end of that. Instead after every game know we get a circus, maybe controversy is what the GAA wants. But officiating football games is now a complete shambles. arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4954 - 06/09/2011 08:04:53 1027896 Link 0 |
Typical the GAA overturn the decision in favour of Dublin. Had that been a Kerry player the suspension would have been doubled. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 8820 - 06/09/2011 08:29:27 1027906 Link 0 |
Great news for Dublin dermo got the all clear to play in the final. clondalkindub (Dublin) - Posts: 9926 - 06/09/2011 08:33:12 1027907 Link 0 |
To those non believers that are still arguing he only got off because he is from the capital is madness. The dublin following rarely dissagreed with the actions of Connolly, but most knew fairly quickly that getting him off was a foregone conclusion. Why? The rule book is farce at this stage and should be withdrawn. "If he was from Kerry" it would have been doubled? Yawn, theres no rule saying that if you lose your appeal then the original punishment is doubled, maybe there should be. glenquagmire (Dublin) - Posts: 20 - 06/09/2011 09:16:23 1027935 Link 0 |
This was posted as a new thread but as the subject matter is the same it has been incorporated here. Administrator (None) - Posts: 2275 - 06/09/2011 09:18:24 1027938 Link 0 |
So Dublin players can strike out now and get away with it? Although Marty Boyle did dive, he would not have done so if Connolly did not strike out at him. squareball_1988 (Donegal) - Posts: 343 - 06/09/2011 09:24:18 1027945 Link 0 |
Not surprised. Common sese prevailed. Maybe it should prevail a bit more often. thykingdomcome (Kerry) - Posts: 1206 - 06/09/2011 09:25:08 1027947 Link 0 |