(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Che1959 - I was looking at your two tier system a few posts ago. I am a Marys man and agree that thier needs to be two divisions with more teams in them. My gripe would be playing senior league football and intermediate ch'ship football. Why would we not be in the the counties top cup competion if we were in the counties top league Burdo (Dublin) - Posts: 29 - 16/10/2009 13:56:09 456449 Link 0 |
burdo gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 16/10/2009 14:22:34 456469 Link 0 |
If FMs can do it with hard work and dedication any team can. gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 16/10/2009 14:23:22 456471 Link 0 |
You would not be playing Senior league you will be playing Division 1. This is a system used in many counties. For championship purposes Marys et al will retain their intermediate status and thus will compete against teams more on their level come championships. If Mary's were to play EGB, Macs, RC's and FM's at Championship strength they would be comprehensively beaten. They stand more chance against these teams in a league environment where they are less likely to be at full strenth every week thus increasing the chance of an upset. Che1959 (Galway) - Posts: 56 - 16/10/2009 21:10:48 456873 Link 0 |
Mary's and Barnabus couldn't even beat Mitchels intermediates in the championship this year. And Mitchels showed how ordinary they were in the final. How do Mary's reckon they should be competing senior? an_carraig (UK) - Posts: 55 - 17/10/2009 18:29:45 457286 Link 0 |
I am a Marys man and at no point have we ever said we said should be playing senior football, the way the leagues and championships are structured at the minute we are not a senior club at any level. The issue is that the stronger clubs at inter, who field regulary as well, Barnabus, Brendans, Noamh Padraig and Marys should be put up to a new senior league as thats where every club should want to be playing there sport at the highest level possible. If one of those clubs went up next year to senior they would not compete, hence why no one has wanted to the last few years. If they all went up would mean they would at least compete in some games with each other whilst getting as many games as possible against the stronger teams and hopefully closing the gap on them in the meantime. I remember Four Masters being at the level Marys and the others are at now and look at them , maybe winning the senior league and senior champ finals. The inter league this year has been a joke with those clubs mentioned above pretty much being the only ones fielding in it, we have had walkovers this year against Finbars twice, Rugby gaels , Noamh Padraig, Erin Ga Bragh and Mitchells who all pretty much could not be bothered to travel to Wolverhampton to play league games. As for being unable to Mitchells then fair play to them, i like most people thought the inter champ this year would be between those clubs at inter who always field. What i wil say though is having beaten Mitchells Inter in the league this year, took them to a replay in the champ and having played Mitchells senior in the Father Taffe cup as part of a combined team, the strongest team we faced from Mitchells club wasnt the senior one! blackandwhite (UK) - Posts: 64 - 18/10/2009 22:24:13 458206 Link 0 |
I think black and white if you read Burdo's post he is saying you should be playing senior football. bill1 (UK) - Posts: 7 - 19/10/2009 08:32:37 458371 Link 0 |
Bill 1 - Think you will see if you read Burdo's post he says thats St Marys should be playing Senior Football if there are 2 divisons. If there is the current 3 divisions next year with the same number of teams and the same structure for the leagues and cups then clearly we wouldnt be senior as we could not compete with the current clubs up there. blackandwhite (UK) - Posts: 64 - 19/10/2009 10:42:42 458493 Link 0 |
Can anyone tell me the results from yesterdays All Britian Club Championship games. audacious (UK) - Posts: 24 - 19/10/2009 11:15:17 458549 Link 0 |
Black and white, I'm all in favour of expanding the senior league, however the problem that occurs, and is part of the reason that we have got to where we are at at the moment, is that invariably someone becomes the whipping boys, and when it comes to these boys then travelling long distances for hammerings teams start giving walkovers. We then end up with a situation like tou see in the intermedate league at the moment, Which is very frustrating. Don't get me wrong i think if teams come up and stick at it, it is the way forward. Maybe a way round it would be to split the league after everyone has played once. Then the top teams play a further two games against one another and the bottom teams likewise. This way the newer weaker teams will only have to endure the one hammering while teams that make the step up successfully have the chance of challenging the established teams on a regular basis. Hman (Donegal) - Posts: 111 - 19/10/2009 17:44:07 459210 Link 0 |
It is quite evident that the gap between Intermediate and Senior is a large one, whereas the gap between Junior and Intermediate isn't! We should revert back to 2 leagues and certainly expand the Senior league as there are not enough regular fixtures for them to play! Players motivation towards any sport will start to suffer if they aren't playing regular league fixtures! My club went at least 2 months without a fixture and that is just crazy! ciarraileaid (Kerry) - Posts: 3 - 20/10/2009 15:23:08 460370 Link 0 |
Did anyone travel to the all britain q/f beaten by 4 points lucky it wasnt mitchels or kierans as the gap would have been much greater. gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 20/10/2009 15:48:58 460409 Link 0 |
Sorry, Bothered (Leitrim) - Posts: 20 - 21/10/2009 07:47:40 461151 Link 0 |
Ciarraileaid, Can you explain the logic behind your suggestion on increasing the size of the senior leagues, given that you have said that there is a big gap between senior & intermediate. An intermediate club that isnt able to win the championship in that grade is hardly likely to want to go senior under those circumstances! To answer a previous poster, the suggestion of all county football league set up, with different divisions but ignoring championship gradings was suggested a few years ago by a now former Board officer. The clubs ignored the suggestion, out of hand. Not sure if any of the delegates mentioned it to their members. I suggest that it is the clubs you need to persuade, not the Board. Perhaps it is an avenue worth considering but not half cocked! Eligibility and rules must be established before it starts so that is doesnt degenerate into a series of arguments, objections & investigations. If intermediate clubs are forced into the senior grade at championship, there must be some protection for them so that they can find their feet at the higher grade. Perhaps the Fr Taaffe Cup could be played for initially by the former intermediate clubs as a Senior "B" Championship and thereafter between first round losers, but as a Senior "B" Championship so that these clubs have some "buy in" to an enforced and inappropriate regrading. We must be careful to ensure that short term gain (an enlarged SFC) does not result in log term loss (uncompetitive teams folding). It is about now that the schools initiative should be having an affect on our clubs but in most cases it appears to be benefiting the strong and leaving the rest with very little. There is at least as big a gap between the top & bottom clubs in the intermediate league, as there is between senior & intermediate. Probably isnt doing Rugby Gaels any good, they deserve to be playing in an appropriate grade. Reading a previous post a member apparently voiced an opinion that they should not be in the same grade as St Barnabas, however Nottingham were whipping boys at senior for several years before they went down, so who is right? In the 1960`s the Fr Forde Cup was run from the end part of one season to the early part of the next. It was for senior teams as is the case now, but commenced after the JFC was over and the junior champions were included in the draw (there was no intermediate grade at the time). It gave the Junior champions a crack at a senior team in preparation for the following season. Lots of possibilities, just need to agree on the right ones! patrick (UK) - Posts: 52 - 21/10/2009 12:02:50 461382 Link 0 |
Patrick gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 21/10/2009 13:52:21 461587 Link 0 |
gael2200 patrick (UK) - Posts: 52 - 21/10/2009 17:26:25 461865 Link 0 |
Patrick gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 21/10/2009 19:24:00 461973 Link 0 |
Your proposal would not work as both of your championships would be dominated by the larger clubs. Either Macs, Casements, JM's or EGB would be certain to win the Senior and I would expect these teams 2nd strings to dominate the Junior. How can you seriously expect St Mary's or Brendans to compete against the likes of EGB and Macs at senior championship strength??? Incorporating these clubs into a Division 1 type league whilst retaining their intermediate status for championships would be more practical. As Master's have shown the league is about who can field their strongest team throughout the year, as they have 4 victories against EGB and Macs respectively who fielded severely weakened teams. As an EGB man you will know that we seldom field at full strength in the league, thus increasing the likelihood of an upset from which the weaker teams can benefit. I for one can remember travelling to Leicester and Notts with a weakened team and struggling. Che1959 (Galway) - Posts: 56 - 21/10/2009 21:57:04 462224 Link 0 |
The big issue here is competition. Intermediate teams refusal to move to up to Senior level after winning the championship/league has resulted in our Senior league shrinking and from the outside in that doesn't reflect well on Warwickshire GAA! It has already been proven that a team that were once the whipping boys of the Senior League have turned it around and are now challenging for top county honours! ciarraileaid (Kerry) - Posts: 3 - 21/10/2009 23:54:39 462405 Link 0 |
Che1959 gael2200 (UK) - Posts: 195 - 22/10/2009 10:34:40 462577 Link 0 |