(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
I think you have spectacular missed the point, like outrageously so
Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 12481 - 28/07/2025 14:26:25 2628677 Link 0 |
Why would you think that? Clifford kicked outrageous points yesterday that were definitely worth 2 points.
hopballref (Galway) - Posts: 452 - 28/07/2025 14:33:44 2628679 Link 1 |
I don't disagree but Morris got more scores and one was a goal. Maybe I'm wrong about Morris not scoring a two pointer? I'm just saying that any player scoring 1-6 from play with no two pointers, deserves more than any player scoring 9 including 2 pointers. The balance isn't right. I'm aware Clifford has scored put up outrageous scores of all denominations, I just used it as an example Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 12481 - 28/07/2025 14:41:58 2628681 Link 0 |
Of course they were worth 2 points. That's the rule! Michael Murphy kicked a brilliant free, from a very tight angle and got one point. Seán O'Shea kicked a relatively simple free, but just outside the arc and got 2 points. MesAmis (Dublin) - Posts: 13837 - 28/07/2025 14:42:36 2628683 Link 1 |
Incredible level to reach there to miss your point! Yeah, I'd worry about what type of game we'll have in 10 years if the 2 pointer remains. We got a snapshot of it yesterday. Kerry being slow and ponderous around the arc (can't risk a tackle on them as it'll be a 2 point free attempt), waiting for their opportunity to take on a fairly central 2 pointer. I don't see why they merit double another point. MesAmis (Dublin) - Posts: 13837 - 28/07/2025 14:46:05 2628686 Link 0 |
Exactly. If Clifford got freedom Morris had from Galway he'd have scored 2-9. Morris didn't do damage against Donegal but I'm sure if he or rest of Meath colleagues had that game back they may be alot better. Clifford's skill to kick those two pointers is worth it's weight in gold and may encourage other teams to find or develop better players.
winatallcost (Meath) - Posts: 768 - 28/07/2025 14:50:42 2628691 Link 1 |
"not to take away from Clifford in any way, or compare the players" Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 12481 - 28/07/2025 15:05:02 2628700 Link 0 |
Keep the 2 pointer but extend the arc more towards the endline, though apparently some pitches are only 80 metres wide. Every sideline free scored should be worth 2 points. Only frees where the kicker is fouled kicking for two points should be worth 2 points. I think if they were to scrap the 2 pointer and have a 4 point goal it would make some games awful to watch, defences too deep and too many balls put into the mixer. Goals are harder to score but watching points being kicked, especially from distance, is great to watch. GreenandRed (Mayo) - Posts: 8189 - 28/07/2025 15:15:36 2628705 Link 0 |
Are you sure there's enough "ifs" in your post? I'm just talking about 2 actual events that happened in this particular timeline in the multiverse.
Breffni40 (Cavan) - Posts: 12481 - 28/07/2025 15:15:52 2628707 Link 0 |
Yeah, but picture this, if all frees were worth only one point, no matter where they came from: Donegal two points up yesterday, with the 70-minute hooter gone. David Clifford, already with three two-pointers to his name on the day, is lining up a scoreable shot from 41 metres. Donegal absolutely assault him and take him out of the game. He has to go off injured. Now Kerry have a free that'd be worth only one point. Their only option is to play it short and try create another two-pointer opportunity, while their best two-pointer kicker is on the sideline. That's an extreme example all right, but it shows how two points for a free from outside 40m is to discourage tactical fouling. And yes, there's an anomaly in that a 45 is kicked from further out. But the difference is that no 45 is the result of a tactical foul. Pikeman96 (Wexford) - Posts: 2990 - 28/07/2025 15:18:31 2628709 Link 0 |
Yep - after reading the posts on this I agree. Definitely needs some more thinking. slayer (Limerick) - Posts: 6523 - 28/07/2025 15:23:29 2628713 Link 0 |
I kind a 45 should be an indirect free never mind a two pointer. Yes, you want to discourage tactical fouling and that's why the two point free outside the arc. As another poster has mentioned a technical free is being punished too much when outside the arc. An overcarry, touching the ball in the ground, a double bounce should not be punished by a two point concession. As others have said the fairest way to have an additional score for outside the score us to completely change the scoring system. That would be much fairer but that won't happen. Ulsterchamps_32 (Donegal) - Posts: 922 - 28/07/2025 16:00:08 2628731 Link 0 |
Slightly adjust. Shouldn't be two point frees from outside the arch. UsernameInvalid (Meath) - Posts: 431 - 28/07/2025 16:12:51 2628737 Link 0 |
All the new rules need to be tweaked a little or binned completely. The forward mark needs to go. The advantage rule is a joke now, players carrying the ball 20/30m down the field and then losing it only for the ref to call the play back. Handing the ball back to your opponent, cant tackle a player on a solo and go all need to get dumped cluichethar (Mayo) - Posts: 566 - 28/07/2025 16:33:57 2628747 Link 0 |
Why was the 2 point rule needed? Because all players were being discouraged from attempting (and learning) a fundamental skill of the game. tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1530 - 28/07/2025 16:52:06 2628756 Link 1 |
Big difference between football 2 pointer and basketball 3 pointer. Close to the endline in basketball you can see all the hoop you are shooting towards, could shoot with both hands, a defender with minimal contact trying to stop you and you're indoors. In football if you're close to the endline you've a very obscured view of your target, you can probably only kick with your foot on the pitch side and you have weather to contend with plus a defender trying to peel the head off you trying to stop you.
GreenandRed (Mayo) - Posts: 8189 - 28/07/2025 17:10:25 2628763 Link 0 |
Needs to be 4 points for a goal, hardly worth going for goals anymore when you can rack up 2 pointers. Tirchonaill1 (Donegal) - Posts: 3399 - 28/07/2025 17:25:08 2628776 Link 1 |
I agree it would be sensible to leave the rules mostly as they are for at least 2 more years. They are barely a wet week in and there has already been changes to them this year. We will only know how the 2 point rule really pans out with a few more seasons and when coaches have a few years at it so this is not a time for a 4 point goal when we haven't even allowed the 2 pointer to settle in. There's too much learning to be done at the moment and while the changes have been dramatic they have greatly improved the game but they are only 6 months old. We don't know what coaches will do over the winter and based on the past 20 yrs could we be faced with another era of negative tactics? Even the FRC did not envisage a player who was fouled bringing the free outside and gaining 2 points for what should have been a pointer something I don't agree with but there's enough evidence there to change that one. I would also somewhat agree with extending the arc. Anyway we must be thankful to finally see forwards with talent allowed to play football and not handball. We've witnessed the best football in well over 20 yrs in the last 6 mths.
Dothesimplethingswell (Sligo) - Posts: 5 - 28/07/2025 17:54:33 2628784 Link 0 |
Keep it but bring back the 4point goal. Overthebar53 (Carlow) - Posts: 372 - 28/07/2025 18:27:20 2628794 Link 2 |
I mean is this even a question, why would you get rid of it? Cabbagepatch1667 (Meath) - Posts: 51 - 28/07/2025 18:39:00 2628795 Link 2 |