(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
If the GAA implemented a stop clock system(like they have in ladies football) then fewer games would go to extra time or penalties. It's almost an unwritten rule that if a team is trailing they'll be given one more chance by the referee, the stop clock removes that option. PK57 (Louth) - Posts: 1661 - 09/06/2022 14:05:32 2423595 Link 1 |
"Next score wins" wouldn't be particularly suitable for hurling. The ball could break to somebody from the throw-in and he could stick it over the bar from midfield without anybody else even getting a tap at it. To me, that'd be a worse way to lose a match than being beaten on penalties.... Pikeman96 (Wexford) - Posts: 2856 - 09/06/2022 14:09:19 2423596 Link 0 |
Absolutely they still happen, and will continue to. Refs are human. I would just not want to see a situation we had a golden score that shouldn't have been. And lord know even this past week we had enough contentious scores. Golden goal works in soccer (even though they've got rid) as they've just goals. That we have a sport that has far more scores makes it just unwieldy for me. And absolutely no to the NFL solution, that is a common one that is attacked regularly. Their overtime solution is just terrible all round as you can win without the otehr team even touching the ball. And possession works differently for their sport for set number of downs. We're tying ourselves into tangles on this thread to come up with left field ideas, while the penalty option is still clearly the best and most fair out of all suggested. Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2466 - 09/06/2022 14:24:20 2423600 Link 0 |
I don't agree that penalties are the fairest option. In Soccer statistically the team that wins the coin toss wins 60% of the time. The NFL solution would arguably work better in GAA than in the NFL itself as there is contested possession.
brianb (Kildare) - Posts: 439 - 09/06/2022 17:18:19 2423669 Link 0 |
Then adjust it. There a system to counteract that. Team 1 goes first, the team 2 takes 2 and so on. It's still far better than some of the crazy takes some have given above.
Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2466 - 09/06/2022 17:42:53 2423672 Link 0 |
"I like the idea put forward a while back for soccer where the penalties would precede extra time so teams would know who's winning in the event of a further draw." Interesting idea. So nobody can say they didn't have their chance. Actually more logical, and fairer, than having penalties afterwards. And the argument against 50s (or 45s as of course they now called lol) is as has been pointed out - the defending team can do nothing but watch - at least with a goalie, you have a chance. And, unless we want to let the best long range free taker take all 5 kicks, most teams do not have 5 or more players who could nail a 50 metre free off the ground with any consistency. It'd be a shambles, watching a string of wides. And taking it out of the hands would not work, as everyone cheats and steals yards. Incidentally, the first time that penalties have decided a senior provincial championship match in either club or inter-county football was Derrygonnelly v Trillick in the Ulster Club. (Before that, there had been a shootout in a Monaghan SFC game between Scotstown and Truagh Gaels, while two had taken place in the Connacht Football League - although the latter two games which featured Mayo against Leitrim and Galway - both went directly to penalties at the end of normal (not extra) time. Derrygonnelly won a thriller 6-5 on penalties, the Trillick lad hitting the post with their 6th penalty. Excellent penalty taking by both teams, neither of whom would have been in any way used to that. essmac (Tyrone) - Posts: 1141 - 10/06/2022 09:04:11 2423710 Link 0 |
Why not a version of an ice hockey shootout. tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1383 - 10/06/2022 09:56:28 2423716 Link 0 |
Is it really not just easier and quicker to do penalties...
Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2466 - 10/06/2022 14:48:47 2423786 Link 1 |
No. Stick to penalties.
Rolo2010 (Donegal) - Posts: 746 - 10/06/2022 15:40:41 2423801 Link 3 |
Take 5 players off each team (10 a side) and let them play one period of 10 mins. That would separate a lot of teams. Would test squad depths, and would reward the best squads. And it's decided on football, not a lottery. SouthOfTheGap (Donegal) - Posts: 777 - 10/06/2022 17:24:02 2423819 Link 0 |
Why not do it? Here are two reasons: 1 - Each attempt could take an absolute age if attacking side gets the ball first and plays an almost endless series of one-two passes between each other. 2 - Each attempt could be over in just a couple of seconds if one of the defending team wins the sprint to the ball and boots it back past halfway. Attacking team wouldn't get a chance to score at all. Pikeman96 (Wexford) - Posts: 2856 - 10/06/2022 17:33:14 2423822 Link 0 |
Your criticism is noted 2 easy fixes 1. Shot clock/time limit 2. Give the attacking team more of a head start (or possession) Personally I am happy enough with penalties but I do like an ice hockey shoot out tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1383 - 11/06/2022 07:46:07 2423856 Link 0 |
Hahaha, I'm glad someone else agrees with my own assessment, I thought I was going mad!
Tacaí Liatroma (Leitrim) - Posts: 1174 - 14/06/2022 14:25:46 2424957 Link 0 |
Ya know, that's not a bad idea at all. Would be rubbish for soccer, just play defensively for 30 mins and hold on, but for Gaelic it would work i think. It's like giving the shootout winner an extra half point, and both teams know exactly where they stand at the start of extra time. No sitting back and settling for the full-time whistle.
Tacaí Liatroma (Leitrim) - Posts: 1174 - 14/06/2022 14:29:07 2424958 Link 0 |
. I liked your closing line "But it's a start, albeit a mental one." The GAA could borrow it as a tagline for the new championship setup next year. "You wanted change so we changed - It's a start, albeit a mental one." "It's mental but its New" timmyhogan (UK) - Posts: 290 - 14/06/2022 18:48:25 2425029 Link 1 |
There is criticism of penalties in some quarters after yesterday. Deciding the match on the day is the right approach. Penalties seem fair enough to determine the winner on the day. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 8788 - 27/06/2022 09:04:41 2427835 Link 0 |
Big fan of penalties. Galway9801 (Galway) - Posts: 1942 - 27/06/2022 12:13:17 2427941 Link 3 |
Spot on, I've been saying that for years. No more of this giving a team a last opportunity even if time is up. Its transparent and nobody in the stadium is under any illusions as to how much time is left or if the ref blew a bit early or player over. It couldn't be that hard to implement. Bon (Kildare) - Posts: 2320 - 27/06/2022 13:37:03 2427985 Link 0 |
How did that apply yesterday? Referee indicated 8 mins injury time. Armagh won a genuine free close to 8 mins. Completely transparent. Less of the conspiracy theories Claretandblue (Westmeath) - Posts: 2152 - 27/06/2022 14:05:08 2428010 Link 0 |
Where were all the moaners when this was proposed to a committee? ExiledInWex (Dublin) - Posts: 1340 - 27/06/2022 14:40:04 2428026 Link 0 |