(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
|
I dont see any scenario where a team might have a goal chance - the defense closes it down and they start passing it around - they will either go back for an open 2 or take the hand 1. face the kick out and keep the pressure on. The real benefit of the 4 point goal is 1 - the game is never over - 2 the safe fisted point or tap over on the 14/21 will be ditched for a goal change - you'll only need to score 1 goal chance out of 4 to match a 100% strike rate from inside the arc tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 2056 - 11/09/2026 18:09:51 2693552 Link 0 |
|
Maybe in 'wrestle' situations, best to give 'benefit of the doubt' to both players (no +50m)?
omahant (USA) - Posts: 3613 - 13/09/2026 16:28:50 2693686 Link 0 |
|
I don't relate your first paragraph to my point - maybe my blind spot?
omahant (USA) - Posts: 3613 - 13/09/2026 16:38:49 2693687 Link 0 |
|
No need for any of the new changes could be a disaster mcstay bad track record SAMFORHILLS9292 (Donegal) - Posts: 20 - 02/10/2026 13:52:13 2695926 Link 0 |
|
6 Subs make sense as there's more action in the game. Could at least have given the enhanced rules 3 full years before looking at the rest. Seanfan (Roscommon) - Posts: 1003 - 02/10/2026 14:33:01 2695932 Link 0 |
|
https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2026/1015/1595582-santry-showcase-puts-two-new-rule-tweaks-in-spotlight/ Fionn (Dublin) - Posts: 5351 - 16/10/2026 09:19:13 2697495 Link 0 |
|
I wonder if 'limiting consecutive hand passes to three' is not what's needed. omahant (USA) - Posts: 3613 - 16/10/2026 20:34:24 2697594 Link 0 |
|
So a whopping 76% of inter-county players are opposed to ANY further rule changes and only 0.5% feel that significant changes are needed. The rest would support some minor adjustments: https://hoganstand.com/Article/Index/342199 Gaillimh_Abu (Galway) - Posts: 1063 - 22/10/2026 22:14:32 2698276 Link 1 |
|
Only tweaks needed are extending the 40m arc and 6 subs.
Seanfan (Roscommon) - Posts: 1003 - 23/10/2026 11:57:52 2698318 Link 1 |
|
We've got a brilliant product now, need to be careful not to end up like Father Ted and the Rover 213 SE Shearer (Louth) - Posts: 965 - 10/11/2026 13:22:57 2699961 Link 3 |
|
Fully agree. Score a 45 and get 1 point Score a free at the 40m arc and get 2 points. Make it make sense…. ;o( Fionn (Dublin) - Posts: 5351 - 10/11/2026 17:12:16 2699984 Link 0 |
|
That should spell the end of the latest group put together by HQ hoping for more change.
Drax_the_destroyer (UK) - Posts: 1021 - 10/11/2026 22:20:34 2700009 Link 1 |
|
It makes sense because a 45 is as a result of a ball going out of play. Two points for a ball going out of play would be too much. A free is as a result of foul play, so the punishment should be greater. WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 3163 - 10/11/2026 22:55:43 2700012 Link 1 |
|
I wouldn't just say most players don't want any more rule changes so that's the end of the discussion. Before the current rule changes most managers wanted no change because they were used to the status quo. Very few football people now argue against those rule changes. I would like more kicking and allow defenders to do a little more in the tackle. In terms of getting more kicking, I'm unsure what is a workable way of achieving this. I'm not sure the 3 pass hand rule is workable yet but am prepared to trust the GAA to trial this in a smart way as the previous committee managed trialing the previous new rules in such a smart way. GreenMan1987 (Meath) - Posts: 147 - 10/11/2026 23:32:29 2700014 Link 0 |
|
That rule is there to stop teams with top level free takers from the ground from just playing to get 45s by kicking it off the other team when they could kick their own score.
otgarom (Mayo) - Posts: 30 - 11/11/2026 02:39:58 2700019 Link 0 |