(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Tailteann cup groups are balanced because the seeding is based on the league. God forbid we do that for Sam Maguire and have a senior championship based on merit instead of luck tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1600 - 02/05/2024 05:55:19 2542383 Link 0 |
You look at the fixtures in the group stages of the 2 competitions and they are the sorts of games that should be played but they are let down a little bit by the 3 going through system.
Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4614 - 02/05/2024 08:20:41 2542389 Link 0 |
Play the provincial championships before the league with the winners getting top seeding… the rest made up from league placing.., the current system is not fit for purpose.. Imagine Clare or Louth still in the running for a top seed while League champions Derry are considered 3rd seeds… bonkers stuff but typical of GAA incompetence…! ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 4243 - 02/05/2024 10:11:56 2542407 Link 0 |
If the provincial championships are before the league, it should be provincial winners only qualifying. The remaining places then coming from the league and Tailteann winner. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 9187 - 02/05/2024 10:53:10 2542420 Link 0 |
If the seedings were like this 1 - Dublin,Kerry, Donegal/Armagh, Mayo/Galway 2 - Derry, Tyrone, Mayo/Galway, Armagh/Donegal 3 - Roscommon, Monaghan, Cavan, Cork 4 - Louth, Westmeath, Clare, Meath There would be no complaints at all. tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1600 - 02/05/2024 10:56:41 2542422 Link 0 |
If they had the two losing teams from the first round play each other in the second round, then the games on the last day would always mean something Add in a relegation play off and everyone is playing for something on the last day tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1600 - 02/05/2024 10:59:08 2542423 Link 0 |
Which would be the way with my suggestion
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 4243 - 02/05/2024 13:30:31 2542458 Link 0 |
edu (Mayo) - Posts: 118 - 02/05/2024 16:04:06 2542499 Link 0 |
A lot of good points in there.
omahant (USA) - Posts: 3350 - 02/05/2024 17:06:29 2542512 Link 0 |
I completely agree. The preliminary quarter-finals only have a weeks notice and everyone gets on with it. The All-Ireland group stage draw should be after the provincial finals are played. Provincial runners-up should be treated the same as Tailteann winners in that they are seeded on league placing.
legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 9187 - 02/05/2024 17:28:21 2542518 Link 0 |
I just think there's a missed opportunity to get more of these games and have things be more intense the whole way through the group stage. If you had a tighter number of teams qualifying and had teams battling against relegation rather than the in or out and playing for a bye scenario I think the competition would be more intense and would also facilitate groups of 8 without a loss of intensity. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4614 - 03/05/2024 10:22:22 2542594 Link 0 |
Folks, not dipped in here in a while, and got caught up in format changes in another thread os coming back in. Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2484 - 03/05/2024 11:41:24 2542612 Link 1 |
I see where you are coming from but disagree. I think teams, players and fans want more meaningful games. The current system isn't giving us it but I think it's a waste that there's only about 7 meaningful games a year. The group stage is rubbish. The provincials are rubbish The league is the league. It's a little bit more important than it was particularly for division 2 and 3 but still, we have teams shadow boxing in the league. It's a waste. We have a good game of football between Derry and Dublin and yes Derry have one a national title but would you think Dublin were that pushed about losing that game. They've bigger fish to fry. So I think the balance is all wrong in terms of impactful games in the primary competition. A modified league should be the championship. The Provincials cause issues in terms of fairness and complicating the system to be incorporated into the All Ireland in my view. They either are barely relevant like in the current system or give an unfair advantage to teams in easier provinces. In my view they should just be decoupled. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4614 - 03/05/2024 12:00:38 2542614 Link 1 |
Back to the Future?!
Seanfanbocht (Roscommon) - Posts: 2558 - 03/05/2024 12:01:32 2542615 Link 0 |
Honestly though. I'm not sure more and more games sorts this. Especially when we hear about so many training sessions, and how much it costs counties to run teams. Maybe go to knockout and teams are then done and you're not running teams for 5 weeks for groups stages when it is not needed. Like we had an unprecedented era from the early 90s to mid 00s when we had multiple new winners of provincials and Sam, and long droughts broken. Yet we broke that system up. The one season recently we had upsets was 2020. And what was the difference in that Championship compared to recently? We seem unable to think or go back to old things, but has to be something new, something different, Champions League style etc. But that's not us Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2484 - 03/05/2024 12:31:25 2542624 Link 0 |
Do they though? And are all these e3xtra games meaningful? We're seeing fans drop off, media can't keep up with all the games, papers can't get reviews done and build up and so on. Why is that a waste? Less games ends up being more meaningful. Simply adding in game for the sake of it does not make games more meaningful, if anything it dilutes it. games are becoming missable The League is indeed the League. Group stage is indeed rubbish. And no, not all provincials are rubbish. Some are, but some aren't. Imagine if hurling killed their provincials because Connacht and Ulster had bad ones? Probably not. As it's about Championship. So let's make Championship properly meaningful again. League is League. Let's not put the cart before the horse. Play League, then a proper Championship that doesn't have mini leagues in them. A modified League in Championship? Who actually wants that? I think they only cause issues if you look at them the wrong way round. If you still use them to feed into a knockout, then they still work. I just can't see what killing them will solve, other than getting rid of a chance of silverware that are the only source of silverware that a lot of counties ahve a chance of winning. It's be madness to get rid because we want more leagues in Championships. Does anyone actually want that? So give them relevance. Don't kill them by inaction. It's rewarding failure. The GAA has failed a lot of counties. The solution is not to tackle the end product and kill the provincials, but to look at root causes. At the end of the day, Kerry and Dublin will win the majority of All ireland anyway. Whether it's knockout, or a League format that had 50 round robin games. We keep trying to add more games in where we tell ourselves that teams have more of sa chance. But that only suits the biggest teams. Knockout shows that the best teams can be caught on the day Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2484 - 03/05/2024 12:41:21 2542628 Link 0 |
"A modified League in Championship? Who actually wants that?" There was a vote a few years ago with a proposal that had a modified league as championship and the provincials decoupled that actually received a majority of delegates but failed to meet the requirements for change. That wasn't even a very good proposal in terms of how the league was to be modified, obviously I can't know if it would've passed had it been a more sensible league based structure but I'd loved to have seen that be tried. I think it was bizarre that we had a system that was really close to being favoured and then sort of abandoned it. I'm very very confident that's there a much larger cohort of people who would favour a modified league approach than a knockout or qualifiers style approach. I don't like the current system but honestly just can't understand anyone who thinks the old way is what people want now. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4614 - 03/05/2024 14:22:07 2542667 Link 1 |
That's the thing though. The proposals we've seen ahve all been very poor, and best of a bad bunch was being picked. The lague thing was foisted on us with Super 8s, and just seems to be a thing that the GAA want more games, like as if it alone will bring in more revenue or something. I just don't get why diluting a product seems to be better,a nd is accepted. I fail to see why an option of knockout that uses the current seeding isn't ever on the table. It just seems we've been pushed down this current path, and we can tweak changes slightly, but no one admits that maybe going back has more merit overall. Isn't it worth a discussion at least?
Loughduff Lad (Cavan) - Posts: 2484 - 03/05/2024 14:52:32 2542673 Link 0 |
The main protagonists in this are the players,and they were listened to and rightfully so. Here's hoping for a Championships as enjoyable as last year's.
ORIELMAN85 (Monaghan) - Posts: 805 - 03/05/2024 15:12:58 2542680 Link 0 |
Yeah look, I don't disagree with a lot of what you say. I think the big issue is there's no clarity in vision in what we have. Do we want a championship where the top teams play one another more often, if so it needs to be structured properly such that it's, fair, competitive and has enough jeopardy that keeps the increased number of games exciting. If they want a more knockout based championship (which I think the current one sort of is with 12 teams in the knockout phase), then they need to create a competition that makes sense for a knockout format. The current system is between 2 stools and does both badly. I'd say it might even be a bit worse than the old qualifiers system overall and that there isn't enough focus on excitement. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4614 - 03/05/2024 16:38:54 2542693 Link 1 |