(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
The behaviour might not have happened at all if the issue had been dealt with sensibly in the 1st place. What made us a laughing stock around the world, or would have if people around the world actually thought we were as important as our political rulers think we are, is that it's obviously nonsense that someone who is voting with the government, and is in fact part of the government insofar as they had input when the programme for government was drawn up, should take up speaking time reserved for the Opposition. The clue is in the name- Opposition means not on the same team.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 14313 - 23/01/2025 18:19:30 2587198 Link 0 |
Fair enough. I agree with nearly all you said. My biggest gripe is the MEDIA COVERAGE of any of these things. Overloaded in one direction while scant (if any) in the other direction. That's a huge problem when you have so many that look to them for "news" that doesn't have an agenda attached.
Trump2020 (Galway) - Posts: 2294 - 23/01/2025 18:33:23 2587204 Link 0 |
I forgot to mention how many jobs can people start on a Wednesday and then get 2 weeks holidays,after being off for more than 2 months..even trump started work straight away when he was sworn in,no matter what we think of him.. CTGAA10 (Limerick) - Posts: 2425 - 23/01/2025 18:41:15 2587205 Link 1 |
Ministers abd TDs do plenty of work without sitting in the Dáil.
Seanfanbocht (Roscommon) - Posts: 2028 - 23/01/2025 18:55:38 2587207 Link 0 |
It wasnt FF/FG who proposed that those TDs got opposition speaking time. It was the TDs themselves (Lowry, Healy Raes etc). We still don't know whether that was correct or not - it is being legally analysed currently. The "totally correct" thing to do was to proceed with yesterdays order of business in nominating the Taoiseach and allowing the agreed process of solving the speaking time issue to run it's course between now and when the Dail next sits. Shouting down the ceann camhairle without this legal clarification is not democratic. cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 5228 - 23/01/2025 18:55:49 2587208 Link 0 |
I do tend to agree, but. . 1. How is that different to the C&S agreement of 2016-2020? FF agreed on the programme for government then led the opposition while voting/abstaining to keep FG in power. 2. It hasn't yet been clarified if it was incorrect or not (so it doesn't matter if you or I agree or disagree with it) - yesterday's sitting was not the place to challenge it and the manner in which it was challenged should never be welcomed in a public house of representatives. Disrupting the order of business by shouting down people until you get your way, without having the legal clarification that what you're arguing for is fair, is simply not democratic. Get that clarification, then by all means throw your toys out of the pram if you see those clarified rules being broken. Until then, behave like a mature adult and stop wasting tax payers money. cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 5228 - 23/01/2025 20:43:23 2587221 Link 0 |