National Forum

Why is club football 30 mins a half?

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post


Replying To benjyyy:  "Its a completely different type of intensity (to a varied degree depending on position). Its mainly about power.

A GAA player will run about 50% more than a rugby player during a game.

Anyway, this is off-topic. I agree that all games should be 35 min halves."
Well I'm not buying this analysis you seem to be picking out of the sky but fair enough!

The point I tried to make was that 16-18 year old schools boys were playing 40 mins of rugby per half

Grown men playing football are playing 30.

It's not like you can use the professional vs amateur argument

Wasn't trying to make a comparison between games and they're really not that different a game for there to be 10 minutes difference

Seansy48 (Tyrone) - Posts: 237 - 12/10/2016 15:08:43    1925396

Link

Well I'm not buying this analysis you seem to be picking out of the sky but fair enough!
The point I tried to make was that 16-18 year old schools boys were playing 40 mins of rugby per half
Grown men playing football are playing 30.
It's not like you can use the professional vs amateur argument
Wasn't trying to make a comparison between games and they're really not that different a game for there to be 10 minutes difference
Seansy48 (Tyrone) - Posts:219 - 12/10/2016 15:08:43
No 16 or 17 year old and a lot of 18 year olds playing rugby(if still in school) are allowed play rugby games that are 40 minute long halves. They only play 35 minutes per half. 40 minute halves only exist in under 20 and open grade adult rugby

ormondbannerman (Clare) - Posts: 13473 - 12/10/2016 15:33:28    1925407

Link

Replying To ormondbannerman:  "Well I'm not buying this analysis you seem to be picking out of the sky but fair enough!
The point I tried to make was that 16-18 year old schools boys were playing 40 mins of rugby per half
Grown men playing football are playing 30.
It's not like you can use the professional vs amateur argument
Wasn't trying to make a comparison between games and they're really not that different a game for there to be 10 minutes difference
Seansy48 (Tyrone) - Posts:219 - 12/10/2016 15:08:43
No 16 or 17 year old and a lot of 18 year olds playing rugby(if still in school) are allowed play rugby games that are 40 minute long halves. They only play 35 minutes per half. 40 minute halves only exist in under 20 and open grade adult rugby"
Sorry you're correct it was 35 minute halves at school and 40 minute halves at university.

Still I feel the point i'm trying to make still stands, if school kids can play more than senior footballer can play the same length

Seansy48 (Tyrone) - Posts: 237 - 12/10/2016 15:49:23    1925417

Link

The fitness demands on club players is high enough as it is. 60 mins is sufficient time to decide the contest. Also increasing playing time would like allowing 6 subs make it more difficult for smaller clubs to compete

lillyboy (Kildare) - Posts: 429 - 12/10/2016 15:59:27    1925421

Link

Replying To clondalkindub:  "I've play both as well and would disagree again, for me playing 90 minutes of soccer is way more physically challenging than Gaelic football imo. Yes there's harder hits in football but the demands for certain positions are nowhere near demanding as all the positions in a soccer game."
Playing Junior B was it? Cos you don't seem to making any sense.

TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 7908 - 12/10/2016 18:37:06    1925474

Link