(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Yeah, they actually just adding more gate money for themselves. Totally over blown bs. royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 04/08/2016 21:08:21 1895883 Link 0 |
You'd honestly wonder about their thought process, it's incredible some of the nonsense they come out with.
Htaem (Meath) - Posts: 8657 - 04/08/2016 21:36:56 1895900 Link 0 |
This is the structure that I proposed in a post here on H.S a year ago.Are the GAA reading this forum?This is what we need-more games between the major teams and more big matches for provinical grounds which are vastly under utilised.
edu (Mayo) - Posts: 34 - 04/08/2016 23:05:43 1895947 Link 0 |
we also need more games for the weaker teams,to stop the mass exodus to america every summer. perfect10 (Wexford) - Posts: 3929 - 05/08/2016 08:44:59 1896013 Link 0 |
Agree with Liam. It will marginally increase gate revenues. Quite simply, if you play more matches, more people will attend. Will the average attendance increase? Would Dublin V Donegal be a sell out if both teams know they have two more chances to get to the semi-final? Last week's double header involving Clare/Kerry/Tipp and Galway had 27,000 - I assume there would now be another two double headers beween these counties - would the attendances be above or below 27,000 for those double headers. What will the viewership be like on TV? Is this proposal going to make the Leinster and Munster championship more competitive? Will more people attend a Munster football final (which only gets above 20,000 if it is Cork v Kerry in Killarney as Cork lads are just going for the pints)? Will this help the club player? A shorter gap between league and championship for every county closes some gap for club players. the fixture uncertainty due to the qualifier remains. There are now extra intercounty matches for the top teams. The championship will end earlier for 24 teams which will help. bennybunny (Cork) - Posts: 3917 - 05/08/2016 09:28:40 1896029 Link 0 |
what do people thing of div 3 and 4 teams getting home draws in rounds 1/2/3 - suits us being from limerick so i am biased janesboro (Limerick) - Posts: 1502 - 05/08/2016 09:56:26 1896055 Link 0 |
The more I read down through this proposal the more I felt insulted to be honest. However if I had a vote at congress I am torn as to whether I would be yay or nah. TheFullBack (Galway) - Posts: 110 - 05/08/2016 10:19:59 1896067 Link 0 |
We do need more games bewteen the major teams, but who are the major teams, the 8 counties who happen to make the last 8 of a highly flawed and outdated championship? Personally I don't think so.
Htaem (Meath) - Posts: 8657 - 05/08/2016 10:21:19 1896069 Link 0 |
The last sentence here is exactly right. "GAA needs balance to their championship, all teams on a level playing field, from the start to end" Duffy on Newstalk last night said "That's as good as you can do". Well maybe he needs to leave it to someone else if that's all he can achieve. Tomas O'Se "Window dressing". My view is that this is another straw man like last year's proposal knowing that it will never pass. Then Duffy will be able to repeat the mantra - "well we tried but it was rejected". opa01 (Cavan) - Posts: 503 - 05/08/2016 10:23:20 1896073 Link 0 |
It is a start suppose, however the GAA need to be honest. A new TV contract has to be discussed soon, and I suspect this is the real motivation. I cannot see how this proposal, will help the weaker counties. From where these counties start, it will take a lot of work to get to a Quarter final. Take for example a group consisting of Mayo, Dublin, Tyrone and Donegal, who play this weekend. It would generate huge interest, revenue, and really push these teams on. Imagine Dublin in Ballybofey, Omagh or Castlebar during August. It is a great idea for the closing stages of the Championship but call a spade, a spade, this has absol nothing to do with improving weaker counties, or the plight of the clubs. It is about selling very attractive TV packages to companies and massively increasing sponsorship. As a result the weak will get weaker and we will end up, even morseso than now with superpower counties who will become out of the reach of the others. sam1884 (UK) - Posts: 999 - 05/08/2016 10:29:36 1896078 Link 0 |
Look it's not perfect but at least it is start. They are severely restricted by the provincial championships and they are not going to be removed any time soon. I think we could get some very exciting quarter final games and double headers at Croke Park would be great. The main complaint is that it will not help the weaker counties but I think that is separate. No matter how you arrange fixtures, the better teams are going to progress to the latter stages. Green_Gold (Donegal) - Posts: 1876 - 05/08/2016 10:41:04 1896086 Link 0 |
Agree with Liam. It will marginally increase gate revenues. Quite simply, if you play more matches, more people will attend. ormondbannerman (Clare) - Posts: 13473 - 05/08/2016 10:54:06 1896092 Link 0 |
You're right about the new TV deal and seeing as the carrot for sky in this deal was 2 exclusive QF's (I think) having more games at the QF stage will lead to more exclusive games on non free to air channels. So even if it doesn't increase gate revenues they are trying to get more 'attractive' games at the business end of the championship which they can charge a broadcaster a premium for.
duckula20 (Antrim) - Posts: 175 - 05/08/2016 10:54:24 1896093 Link 0 |
A fixture schedule was included. If I remember correctly the provincial champions start the group a week before the qualifier teams, they have a 3 week break to round 2 and then round 3 is the week after that. Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 4241 - 05/08/2016 11:22:55 1896114 Link 0 |