(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
The game today is hardly about your starting 15 though, its all about your strength in depth. How many of those Dublin players have been involved either starting or off the bench over the last 8 seasons since they've been winning all irelands? keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 05/09/2018 16:24:58 2139552 Link 3 |
What a load of bull, dublin are the greatest football team to ever grace a GAA pitch. I think ts very unfair on those players that people are dismissing their achievements when they have put in just as much work as anyother team. Tarismelting22 (Roscommon) - Posts: 760 - 05/09/2018 16:27:08 2139553 Link 7 |
I count 7 that were involved in Sundays 21...still only a third.
gotmilk (Fermanagh) - Posts: 4971 - 05/09/2018 16:46:11 2139562 Link 0 |
The GAA's messing around with the calendar means that silly season starts earlier than normal. brendtheredhand (Tyrone) - Posts: 10897 - 05/09/2018 16:48:47 2139563 Link 2 |
McKenna's cherry-picking of information, stats and figures only that suit his narrative, and his penchant for going dark or blocking on Twitter when credible counterpoints and expansion of context, is what turns a lot of people, myself included, off. He leaves out figures from provincial councils which reduce the actuality of funding disparity, and when no figures are available to show funding for non-Dublin counties, he treats these figures as non-existent rather than unknown. The per-registered-player comparison in relation to Games Development is also an overused irrelevance, as Games Development money is used in a expansive way in getting non-registered kids into GAA clubs. He writes in an emotive manner, appealing to feeling rather than fact, and lacks an even handed objectivity, especially where Dublin are concerned. Gavvygavgav (Dublin) - Posts: 383 - 05/09/2018 16:54:46 2139566 Link 5 |
For the record I think its also important to say that as much as I don't agree with everything MacKenna is saying here, I still rate him as one of the best writers in the business. If we all agreed on everything it would be a very dull world. He's absolutely right to raise the issue here and to ask questions, we all want a level playing field in the GAA. A lot of counties are suffering today as the game pushes further and further away from the amateur ethos. keithlemon (Australia) - Posts: 920 - 05/09/2018 16:57:21 2139568 Link 2 |
Excellent post.
slayer (Limerick) - Posts: 6480 - 05/09/2018 17:01:21 2139570 Link 4 |
lol
jimbodub (Dublin) - Posts: 20600 - 05/09/2018 17:19:50 2139575 Link 3 |
9. With Brogan missing out through injury. Your original point being that there were only 3 from 2011 final. Big difference between 3 & 9 or 10. Stephen Cluxton Michael Fitzsimons Cian O'Sullivan James McCarthy Michael Darragh MacAuley Philly McMahon Substitutes: Eoghan O'Gara Paul Flynn Kev Mac Jackeen (Dublin) - Posts: 4097 - 05/09/2018 17:48:01 2139581 Link 1 |
Look I think everyone would agree Dublin in their on merit, fantastic team and they aren't like other Dublin teams from the Pillar years who were hard to like. I like the Dublin players now, no bullshit just a great team. The_Fridge (Tyrone) - Posts: 2088 - 05/09/2018 17:48:43 2139582 Link 0 |
That's exactky the point I was making (badly) above. Define fairness. Do we have to fragment each county so that all teams competing are on par with Leitrim? If not then these inequalities exist everywhere. It's all relatve.
Joxer (Dublin) - Posts: 4700 - 05/09/2018 17:50:58 2139583 Link 3 |
Dublin are champions and deserve to be on their displays throughout the year. I don't see haw anybody could dispute that. neverright (Roscommon) - Posts: 1648 - 05/09/2018 17:56:44 2139585 Link 4 |
In order for laois to become all Ireland champions, you would need to resource massively into under age football. You would need to focus on under age from u 13 and aim at a series of u20 leinsters, followed by a push for at least 1 all Ireland u20. You would also need an almost inter county set up for all their senior and some of their intermediate clubs with the same resources to train. In addition, you would need the right dieticians, physios, sports psychologists and any other expert in their field you would care to mention to be in situ in the senior clubs. You would have to monitor the players non stop in order for them to be in tip top order during the pre and peak season. If you could do all this without money then great. What is the tipping point to this in terms of finance? You would have to look at a county that has been successful at this and A-B their balance sheets as closely as you can. It could be done in theory, but it would be massively unlikely, in the same way that Motherwell could win the SPL in theory.
Donegalman (None) - Posts: 3830 - 05/09/2018 18:18:49 2139596 Link 1 |
The major issue with MacKenna is his conflation of Games Development money with Senior Inter County Football perfomance. He refuses to drill down into where and how this money is actually spent, saying that he is not privy to the information, expecting the reader to fill in the gaps, imagining that games development funding pays for Senior Football and Hurling coaching. GDOs commonly spend 4 days a week in schools in the catchment areas for the clubs. This is where the vast majority of Games Development funding to Dublin goes. But MacKenna leaves figures hanging in the wind without context, leaving the reader to imagine NASA-type installations where bionic men are pieced together. This is not a picture of truth. Its hyperbole, which is his stock in trade. This is not to say that other counties shouldn't get funding for more Games Development officers if they are required. Of course they should. Nor is it to say that Dublin's funding should not be examined, in favour of counties where Gaelic Games require urgent boosting. But MacKenna's incomplete figures and context-free stats are in many ways illusory, and he spins a good sentence. Gavvygavgav (Dublin) - Posts: 383 - 05/09/2018 19:03:49 2139608 Link 4 |
MacKenna will be content with no county being greater than Kildare.
Gavvygavgav (Dublin) - Posts: 383 - 05/09/2018 19:05:27 2139610 Link 4 |
Dublin's success is down to sheer commitment and hard work of each and every one of their players. Plus of course skill, talent and unselfishness. GormlaighG (Mayo) - Posts: 77 - 05/09/2018 19:26:31 2139616 Link 4 |
Mckenna job is to look for clicks as to boost advertising. In effect he is a car salesman. Not just on this subject but on everything. 1. Dublin weren't simply given money. They put a plan in place asked for the money to IMPLEMENT and executed it perfectly! Huge huge work done. 2. Everyone talks about the coaches in Dublin club's but remember before they get one they must fund 50% of the costs yourselves. They Are not free. 3. The GAA gave out 40M last year Dublin got the most games development money but not the most money in total! Funny no one talks about the other grants, capital and otherwise, given to Counties. 4. Dublin generate more than the 2M they get so to call this 2M 'financial doping is simply away to seek attention because otherwise more in-depth analysis has to be done and this is beyond the likes of attention seekers like McKenna. 5. 5 and 6 year olds are not regiatered players but huge resources (financial and human) are put in them in Dublin so why when you calculate the per head cost of games development money they are not included? 6. Finally people talk about facilities. Do you realise the All-Ireland champions Cuala have no pitch? They have to use council pitches and then rent Bray Emmets ground for Senior training and marches as often the council pitches grass is too long etc. Their main ground.in Shankill has no dressing rooms!! Or the efforts St. Finbarrs in Cabra have done to keep hurling alive on the basis of no facilities years ago but pure pride in the game and hard work. McKenna could and would never talk about this as it's not with this you get clicks. There is no such thing as a level playing field, Leitrim will not win an All-Ireland, sadly, even if you pump in millions. When people throw out population numbers they forget that though Dublin have one third of the population not even one third of that one third is even interested in the GAA. So for me the arguments are all wrong. The issue we should only be worried is getting as many young kids as possible playing and then keeping them playing beyond 18. And how you do that In Dublin, Cork or Belfast Cities is not the same as in the country village. So we cannot can have the same everywhere but plans based on horse for courses? And it is not just money. And those knocking Dublin and what the.GAA local and national did there should be complementing them. Unless you prefer to see the state of our native games in Dublin as it.is in Belfast? witnof (Dublin) - Posts: 1604 - 05/09/2018 19:28:54 2139618 Link 7 |
Superb post.
Jackeen (Dublin) - Posts: 4097 - 05/09/2018 19:45:30 2139622 Link 3 |
I am ignorant on the issue but how does money build a good football team? they get extra protein bars or what? In my eyes it is obviously to do with having a larger population to pick from, Dublin will always be able to pick 20 great players. PattyONeill (Derry) - Posts: 223 - 05/09/2018 20:08:22 2139630 Link 2 |
Dublin have 39k registered players (in a city of 1.4million). Population does not guarantee 'pick of 20 great players'. If it's simply down to numbers. It should be Cork/Dublin final every Witnof good post. Looks like McKenna is registered here. Croke Park is another red herring. Never mattered b4 2011. Ask Cooper or Mugsey how it felt silencing the Hill. I do think in interest of clarity and fairness HQ should address the financial issues so people can see who's getting what and not leaving clowns like McKenna to spin firgures for clicks. Aido Aido69 (Dublin) - Posts: 381 - 05/09/2018 20:47:51 2139649 Link 3 |