(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
RD i always respect your opinion. brian (Meath) - Posts: 1954 - 18/10/2016 16:11:56 1927315 Link 1 |
Really. He should absorb 10 Minutes of abuse awaiting officials to make a decision and the back should be allowed do what he wants without fear of retaliation. This is not about the player involved personally. There is no way that a player because he is a good footballer should be expected to stand without fighting back and absorb 10 minutes of abuse. While at the same time a marker should be allowed carry out abuse for 10 Minutes without censure. Come on. By any measure of fairness what happened was ludicrous and of course the red card should be rescinded Ashrules (Dublin) - Posts: 518 - 18/10/2016 16:44:06 1927334 Link 1 |
no it shouldn't. it struck a lad with an elbow. end of story. this is not Dublin so a red actually means you are suspended in case you had actually forgotten the rules of the game. Regardless of what the dunderry lads did, he struck a player in the face. Lucky if its just a one game ban.
Irish_downunder (Meath) - Posts: 630 - 18/10/2016 17:20:22 1927348 Link 1 |
I fully expect Graham to be playing on Saturday for the replay. Royal_Gunner (Meath) - Posts: 534 - 18/10/2016 17:43:41 1927351 Link 0 |
they are not going to overturn a decision by david coldrick,did cilles even object can anyone confirm ? thelutch (Meath) - Posts: 1047 - 18/10/2016 17:59:09 1927354 Link 0 |
Brian no bother to you, look opinions are like farts they say, everyone else's stinks apart from your own. I have my opinion, be it wrong or right, same as yours. We wont fall out over it that's for sure. royaldunne (Meath) - Posts: 19449 - 18/10/2016 20:55:07 1927399 Link 0 |
I 100% expect them to look for a hearing for Biggy, but he struck, so how on earth should or would he get off
VernonSmith (Meath) - Posts: 112 - 19/10/2016 10:04:58 1927466 Link 0 |
Well, as I said, I expect him to get off. I didn't say he should get off. I wasn't looking at the game when Biggy allegedly struck the Dunderry player Royal_Gunner (Meath) - Posts: 534 - 19/10/2016 10:25:38 1927475 Link 0 |
Oh he struck him alright I was looking straight at him.If he gets off for that then every player should get off after a red card.
ziggy32001 (Meath) - Posts: 8354 - 19/10/2016 10:33:05 1927477 Link 3 |
Could be an interesting appeal, I would imagine they'll pause the video at 30 secs to discuss the striking incident(s) leading up to the event before fast forwarding to the part where Reilly strikes out. Wedgie (Meath) - Posts: 253 - 19/10/2016 10:42:43 1927483 Link 0 |
Can't go back and suspend the Dunderry man
VernonSmith (Meath) - Posts: 112 - 19/10/2016 11:40:54 1927509 Link 0 |
That's the most common sense comment on this incident Wedgie.
Kepak10 (Meath) - Posts: 162 - 19/10/2016 11:48:57 1927515 Link 1 |
why not ???............wasn't dealt with by ref
Kepak10 (Meath) - Posts: 162 - 19/10/2016 12:04:34 1927523 Link 0 |
So should we just pretend it didn't happen?
Wedgie (Meath) - Posts: 253 - 19/10/2016 14:32:32 1927599 Link 0 |
Sorry Wedgie my question should have been directed at VernonSmith's last remark !
Kepak10 (Meath) - Posts: 162 - 19/10/2016 16:32:37 1927635 Link 0 |
Did the Dunderry man strike or just block Biggy's run?
VernonSmith (Meath) - Posts: 112 - 19/10/2016 17:20:35 1927650 Link 0 |
Watch the video clip.....it's pretty conclusive
Kepak10 (Meath) - Posts: 162 - 19/10/2016 18:39:51 1927678 Link 0 |
Going to try again to get past the heavy handed censorship, one line at a time... There's a far better quality video of the game doing the rounds. Wedgie (Meath) - Posts: 253 - 19/10/2016 20:13:24 1927701 Link 0 |
You can clearly see what happens...
Wedgie (Meath) - Posts: 253 - 19/10/2016 20:40:07 1927704 Link 0 |
The Reilly sending off would never have happened if the incidents in the lead up to it were properly dealt with. Wedgie (Meath) - Posts: 253 - 19/10/2016 21:29:16 1927726 Link 0 |