HoganStand GAA Football and Hurling

National Forum

Change Needed For Extra Time

(Oldest Posts First)

You need to Login to Post

Cavan and Armagh were out on their feet. Apart from a team like Dublin who are like a professional outfit it's totally unfair. I'd get rid of the two 10 minutes of extra time and replace it with one 10 minute period. If it finishes a draw either a replay or a penalty shoot out. Jack_Goff (Meath) - Posts: 2920 - 02/06/2019 18:30:50 2189872 Link
so 1 team should play against the wind for extra time? ive always said that matches level after normal time should be decided on goals.there need to be some incentive to go for the jugular. perfect10 (Wexford) - Posts: 3929 - 02/06/2019 18:45:17 2189883 Link
1 period would be unfair when you factor in weather conditions but i get your point lillyboy (Kildare) - Posts: 429 - 02/06/2019 19:08:49 2189898 Link
Replying To perfect10: "so 1 team should play against the wind for extra time? ive always said that matches level after normal time should be decided on goals.there need to be some incentive to go for the jugular." Good point. Two 5 minute periods then and penalties after. Jack_Goff (Meath) - Posts: 2920 - 02/06/2019 21:52:00 2189999 Link
No change is required. 10 minutes a half in extra time is fine. For debate is to have a shoot-out for for all provincial matches prior to the final when teams are still level after extra time? legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7840 - 03/06/2019 22:05:45 2190342 Link
Replying To legendzxix: "No change is required. 10 minutes a half in extra time is fine. For debate is to have a shoot-out for for all provincial matches prior to the final when teams are still level after extra time?" No, I like the idea of more goals deciding the result before extra time though. Incentive to score goals. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1732 - 04/06/2019 09:43:01 2190402 Link
Replying To StoreysTash: "No, I like the idea of more goals deciding the result before extra time though. Incentive to score goals." So a team who scores 5 times (3-02) should be deemed the winner if they stick 4 men on the goal line for 70mins and concede 0-11? If you want to encourage goals, make them worth 4 points. cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 5012 - 04/06/2019 10:57:15 2190428 Link
Replying To StoreysTash: "No, I like the idea of more goals deciding the result before extra time though. Incentive to score goals." If your idea was to be introduced, Id like to see it introduced after extra time. Think it is a bit harsh to lose a game at the end of 60/70 mins cause you havent scored a goal. After extra time Id have no issue though. Might bring a bit more focus to attacking in extra time. Would be similar to rugby then when the go on tries scored. juicy (Meath) - Posts: 399 - 04/06/2019 12:17:36 2190471 Link
Replying To perfect10: "so 1 team should play against the wind for extra time? ive always said that matches level after normal time should be decided on goals.there need to be some incentive to go for the jugular." Play 10 mins each way extra time still. But make goals worth 5 points and most goals win in the event of a draw after ET. Most shots at goal then if still tied. Penalties then if still level. Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 11827 - 04/06/2019 15:15:48 2190537 Link
I can't claim that idea in fairness, it was perfect10 idea. So a team who scores 5 times (3-02) should be deemed the winner if they stick 4 men on the goal line for 70mins and concede 0-11? If you want to encourage goals, make them worth 4 points. cavanman47 (Cavan) - If a team put 4 men on the line would they not likely concede 12 points? StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1732 - 04/06/2019 15:28:20 2190542 Link
If someone wants goals to decide games level after extra time, the goals can come from the shootout. legendzxix (Kerry) - Posts: 7840 - 04/06/2019 18:08:03 2190591 Link