National Forum

Andy Moran Hands On Maurice Deegan

(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post


Replying To SamandLiamSoon:  "I don't particular want a back in forth either. People's minds are pretty set on what they believe. But in relation to "contact with the referee" it happens a lot. Patting him on the back trying to avoid a booking and being pushed into him during a "melee" or what not. It happens. I would interpret the rule as intentional and aggressive physical contact no matter how small. I'm not sure you can punish a lad or lady for coming into contact with a ref accidentally."
But he didn't pat the ref on the back, nor was he pushed into him in a melee, he ran around others to get to the referee. Now I've no doubt that he didn't intend to actually make contact with the ref, but he put himself in the position where it could occur, so has to accept responsibility for it.

AHP (Dublin) - Posts: 323 - 24/03/2018 15:24:46    2087430

Link

Replying To Llaw_Gyffes:  "I can appreciate your first point, Boyle should have at least been shown a black card and in my opinion it should have been a red. Don't know if Deegan was apologetic or not, not having been near enough to hear what he said but to suggest that the "challenge" on Keegan was anything approaching fair beggers belief."
Boyles challenge was a red card offence and should have been red. The challenge on Keegan I initially taught was fair enough when seeing it live, but on tv it was a red as Tyrone plater was completely off the ground and had no control of tackle.

reffingmad (Roscommon) - Posts: 371 - 25/03/2018 10:56:05    2087632

Link